The principle audi alteram partem needs to applied at every stage of an adversarial proceeding to ensure fair trial, unless its applicability is expressly ousted by statue." 20. So every bit in the matter of extension is void ab initio. "Speedy Justice is a Fundamental Right enshrined under the ambit of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and the same needs to be given effect by this Court in letter and in spirit, else it will remain as a dead letter of law," the Delhi High Court observed on Tuesday. ", "This is an egregious violation of an accused's right to personal liberty and right to speedy trial as, in the off-chance that the Petitioner is acquitted, it would entail an irretrievable loss of eight years of his life that cannot be compensated. The Gujarat High Court has refused regular bail underSection 439 of CrPC to a 66 years old man, from whose property contraband (Poppy Straw) worth Rs. Man Arrested Based On Phone Calls, Money Trail Connected With NDPS Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses Bail. The High Court has said that merely on the ground that the vehicle is liable to confiscation under Section 60 of the NDPS Act, it cannot be held that once the vehicle is seized for the commission of offence under the NDPS Act, interim custody cannot be granted. Singh was found in possession of two polybags containing black colour material, later found to be "afeem". Thus, the Court proceeded to issue a host of directions in this regard. Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav discarded the argument that the arresting officials did not comply with the mandatory provisions of search and seizure under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. Denial Of Speedy Trial Infringes Fundamental Right Under Article 21, May Be A Ground For Grant Of Bail: Delhi High Court, CASE TITLE: GURMITO v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION. 2,52,15,350 was found. [CRIMINAL MISC. The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court reiterated that merely because Section 37 of the NDPS Act comes into play where commercial quantity of contraband is involved, it does not mean that the accused cannot be entitled to bail whatever may be the circumstances that may be borne out from the record. Calcutta HC Denies Anticipatory Bail To NDPS Accused Citing Phone Connection With Person Arrested With Commercial Quantity Contraband, Case Title: In the matter of: Bapi Sk @ Bapi Sekh. A Warner Bros. The Delhi High Court has observed that the object of default bail is inherently linked to Article 21 of the Constitution of India, laying emphasis on safeguarding the life and personal liberty of the accused against arbitrary detention. As the quantity of ganja that was seized from the possession of the petitioners is a commercial quantity, the bar and rigour contained in Section 37 of the NDPS Act applies to the present facts of the case. A Single Judge Bench of Justice Sashikanta Mishra relied upon Iswar Tiwari v. State of Odisha, 2020 (80) OCR 289, wherein the legal position as regards the provisions under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C read with Section 36(A)(4) of the NDPS Act, was elaborately discussed by the Orissa High Court and it was held that the notice must mandatorily be issued to the accused and he must be produced before the Court whenever such an application is taken up and that where any such report occurs the question of it being contested does not arise and a right accrues in favour of the accused. Your effort and contribution in providing this feedback is much NDPS ACT | Minor Discrepancy In Sample's Weight Sent To Forensic Lab Can't Shake Roots Of Prosecution's Case: Allahabad High Court, Case title - Chhotey Lal v. U.O.I. 41. On search of almirah in Singh's house, a cash amount of Rs. [NDPS Act] "Sampling Not Done As Per 1989 Standing Order In Seizure Of 201 KG Ganja": Allahabad High Court Grants Bail, Case title - Wali Hassan v. State of U.P. Drugs Controls Act, 1949 on the ground that cases of drug abuse are on the rise, which is adversely affecting the young generation. The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently held that with respect to search and seizure in cases under the NDPS Act, 'spot' does not mean a place where suspected vehicle or person is intercepted, but a place where search is conducted and recovery of articles is made. 7. CNN Sans & 2016 Cable News Network. It also made reference to the effects of organized activities of the underworld and the clandestine smuggling of narcotic drugs on adolescents and students, as notice by the Supreme Court. In this backdrop, acceptance of the offer by the appellants to be searched before an officer who is a member of the raiding party cannot be said to be a voluntary expression of their desire to be searched before such officer. Justice Jasmeet Singh granted bail to one Laxman Thakur accused in an FIR registered under sections 20 and 29 of NDPS Act. 40. Punjab and Haryana High Court has reiterated that the report of Forensic Science Lab forms the foundation of prosecution case in NDPS proceedings and in case the same is not there the entire case of prosecution falls to ground. The Bench of Justice Krishan Pahal granted bail to one Om Prakash Verma who claimed before the Court that the procedure laid down in the Standing Order to be followed while conducting seizure of the contraband was not followed in the instant case. 33. NDPS Act | Violation Of Mandatory Provisions For Seizure Need Not Be Looked Into In Bail Proceedings Unless Glaring Irregularity Emerges: Delhi HC, Case Title: GURJEET SINGH v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI. It cannot be stated that he was in physical custody of the Court so as to claim the computation of such period in reckoning the period of 180 days of detention to acquire the statutory right under proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 167 Cr. In that decision, the judge wrote that Mr. Hill failed to file written post-hearing submissions. 52. [NDPS Act] Call Conversations B/W Co-Accused Sans Transcript Not Corroborative Material In Absence Of Substantive Evidence: PH High Court, Case title - Vikrant Singh v. State of Punjab and connected matters, The Punjab and Haryana High Court has observed that without the transcript of the conversations exchanged between the co-accused, mere call details would not be considered to be corroborative material in absence of substantive material found against the accused in a case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 66. 62. 50. Federal laws protect everyone from illegal search and seizure. A lower court had allowed the search, holding that the decision to take the firearms without a warrant fell within the Fourth Amendments community caretaking exception., But Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for a unanimous Supreme Court, held that the lower courts broad interpretation of the exception goes beyond anything this Court has recognized.. Further, in spite of directions by the court, the Investigating Officer had not taken steps to number the final report. Justice A. Badharudeen remarked, that it is relevant, rather shocking to note that the Public Prosecutor who was appointed by the State to conduct serious cases of this nature, even not cared at least to read Section 36-A(4) and its proviso, before filing the report of the Investigating Officer pressing for extension of detention of the accused beyond the period of 180 days Indubitably, it is held that, the report/petition filed by the Investigating Officer cannot be considered as a report/petition envisaged under Section 36-A(4), since the Investigating Officer has no such right. Sections 8(C)/18/29 of the NDPS Act after they were arrested from the general bogey of a Train for allegedly being in possession of a total of 7 KG of opium. The High Court granted conditional bail to an NDPS Accused Wali Hasan, accused of smuggling 201 kg of ganja in view of the fact that the sampling of the Ganja was not done as per the Standing Order/Instruction No.1 of 1989. Sections 36-A to 36-C which specify the powers of the Special Judge do not expressly state that such Special Judge can exercise the powers of the Magistrate for the purposes of Section 52-A(2) to (4) of the Act. 72. The bench of Justice Subhash Vidyarthi observed that although the search and seizure were conducted at a Railway Station, there was no independent witness to the alleged recovery as the constables of the Railway Police Force cannot be said to be independent witnesses. along with a connected matter. Interim Custody Of Conveyance/Vehicle Seized Under NDPS Act Can Be Granted U/S 451 & 457 CrPC: Allahabad High Court, Case title - Rajdhari Yadav v. State of U.P. The substance was found to be 750 grams (one polybag containing 400 gms and other 350 gms). After careful scrutiny of section 37 of the NDPS Act 1985 we find that the exercise of power to grant bail is not only subject to the limitations contained in section 439 Cr.P.C, but is also subject to the limitations placed by section 37 which commences with non-obstante clause", the Court underscored further. Justice Sanjay Kumar Medhi observed that this was so because the offences under the Act were part of an organised crime and any convincing and corroborating material in favour of the prosecution would be sufficient to establish their guilt. 45. Since the case was instituted under the NDPS Act, the court also recorded satisfaction regarding twin conditions for bail under Section 37 of the Act. Section 37 of the NDPS Act mandates a more stricter approach than an application for bail sans the NDPS Act. The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that when dealing with a case registered under the provisions of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, the power to grant regular bail under Section 439 CrPC is subject to the conditions laid down in Section 37 of the NDPS Act. P. C, it becomes clear that if an accused has been detained in connection with investigation of a case for a period of more than 180 days in an offence under NDPS Act, he is entitled to be released on bail if he is prepared to and does furnish bail unless the Special Court has extended the period of detention during investigation of the case beyond 180 days, recorded Justice Sanjay Dhar. The Bench of Justice Deepak Kumar Agarwal further observed that the NDPS Act does not contain any bar regarding the grant of interim custody as contained in Section 52C of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. 32. The Delhi High Court has observed that the effect of non-compliance of any mandatory provision under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 by the Investigating Officer or any irregularity or illegality committed at the time of making of the seizure memo is essentially a matter of trial and cannot be looked into at the stage of bail, unless there is any glaring irregularity which will make the seizure itself illegal. Report Filed By Investigating Officer Does Not Satisfy Mandate Of S.36A(4) NDPS Act: Kerala High Court, Case Title: Muhammed Ajmal v. State of Kerala. Act revolve around recovery of narcotic substance from the accused. Emphasing that fair, just and reasonable procedure is implicit in Article 21 and it creates a right in the accused to be tried speedily, the Court observed: "This Court has consistently observed that while Courts must remain cognizant of the deleterious impact of drugs on society, it is also important to keep in mind that deprivation of personal liberty without the assurance of speedy trial contravenes the principles enshrined in our Constitution. Civil Rights, Criminal Law Related Civil Cases, Diversity, Search and Seizure. The U.S. Supreme Court on April 29, 2021 in Washington, DC. The Bench comprising Justice SH Vora and Justice Sandeep Bhatt said, "IO while acting on prior information and before making search of a person, it is imperative for him to inform the respondent-accused about his right to sub-section (1) of Section 50 of the NDPSAct for being taken to the nearest Gazetted Officer or the Magistrate for making search in their presence. To put it differently, temple premises being accessible to the public at large, it cannot be said that said premises were in exclusive possession and control of the applicant", the court said in its order. After the filing of complaint and chargesheet, the witnesses were examined however certain panchas and witnesses turned hostile and supported the case of the prosecution.Subsequently, the trial court after perusing the evidence on record acquitted the accused. The Bench of Justice Sanjay Dhar observed thus as it and that this is the job of the Government to take decisions over including a particular drug in the list of 'manufactured drugs' or 'psychotropic substances' under the NDPS Act. 83. In light of the recent Supreme Court rulings, it is vital that Michigan criminal defendants contact an experienced attorney to discuss the best defense in their specific case.Contact Michigan Defense Law at 248-451-2200 to schedule a free initial consultation with an attorney at our office. The court made the observation while granting bail to Pratap Singh, who was in custody in the case since March 09 last year. The Delhi High Court has observed that while granting bail under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, a Court must have "reasonable grounds" to believe prima facie innocence of the accused and that the accused will not commit a similar offense while on bail. Rafael Gonzalez, Esq., Cattie & Gonzalez, PLLC On June 10, 2022, the United States Supreme Court published its decision on Gallardo v. Therefore, it is as a preparation, mixture, or neutral substance within the meaning of the NDPS Act. Therefore, recovery or seizure cannot be held to be a sine qua non for the arrest/detention or even for conviction if there are other convincing and corroborating materials which in the present case are abundantly available. by . The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court ruled that conditions imposed by the court Section 439(1)(a) CrPC while granting bail cannot by any stretch of imagination be construed to mean that accused person is in custody so as to claim the computation of such period in reckoning the period of 180 days of detention to acquire the statutory right of default bail under proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 167 CrPC read with Section 36A(4) of the NDPS Act. "The applicant is in the business of fertilizers and hence the use of word 'Khad' is neither unusual nor strange. 78. Warrantless Video Surveillance is . Discovery Company. 39. Highlighting the importance of a legitimate recovery procedure, the Court averred, "While a strict law is necessary to control organized crime like drug trafficking and protect the youth from the menace of drug abuse, its draconian provisions are sometimes misused by investigating agency leading to false implication and prolonged unjustified detention of individuals. "This Court is anxious over the fact that jails debilitate the under-trial prisoners and if after the long wait, the accused is ultimately acquitted, then how would the long years spent by the under-trial in custody be restored to him/her/themThe issue of a large number of under-trial prisoners and their poor living conditions has been standing stubborn against the otherwise incandescent face of our democracy," the bench of Justice Farjand Ali remarked. While allowing a criminal revision petition and granting statutory bail to a petitioner in a NDPS case, the Madras High Court observed that even if the investigating agency has filed an application seeking an extension of time for completing the investigation, the public prosecutor has to file a separate report, showing that he had applied his mind and was satisfied with the investigation. 15. 2. OF NCT OF DELHI). 27. 2022-32 was passed on June 30, 2022, the same day that the previous laws . 16.6 lakh was seized. The Bench comprising Justice SH Vora remarkedthat her conscious possession as understood under the law does not surface evena reasonable doubt. 67. 11:30 AM EDT, Mon May 17, 2021. In a significant judgment, the Calcutta High Court directed that in all cases involving recovery of narcotic substances, seizing officers shall make a video recording of the entire procedure and that reasons for failing to videograph the recovery must be specifically stated in the investigation records. The Punjab and Haryana High Court recently held that the sample parcels of alleged contraband that is sent to Forensic Science Laboratory is "case property" and must be produced before trial Court under FSL seal, after the forensic examination is completed. The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that the officers of the Narcotics Control Bureau are police officers within the meaning of Section 25 of the Evidence Act. After the ambulance left, they seized his weapons. The remarks were made while granting bail to an accused under the Narcotics, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, languishing in jail for more than four years. S.42 NDPS Act | Gazetted Police Officer Can Cause Lawful Search Of Enclosed Spaces 'Whether By Day Or Night': P&H High Court, Case Title: Navjot Singh @ Jota Versus State Of Punjab. The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that in cases under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, FSL report goes to the root of the case and hence a charge sheet filed without it cannot be treated as a complete chargesheet. Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy held that: "In the said facts and circumstances of the case, mere non-mentioning of exact quantity of ganja in F.I.R by itself is not fatal to the case of the prosecution. v. State of Punjab, wherein the Apex Court had reached a similar conclusion. However, for non-commercial quantity, there is no such bar for grant of bail under the provision. Mere Operation Of S.37 NDPS Act Does Not Disentitle Accused To Bail, Relief Should Be Granted If Reasonable Grounds Exist: JKL High Court Reiterates. recent illegal search and seizure cases 2022kentucky probate forms inventory. No Bar On Granting Interim Custody Of The Vehicle Seized For Commission Of Offence Under NDPS Act: MP High Court, Case title - SURENDRA DHAKAD Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. In December, the Court released an addendum to Almon v Hill, 2022 NSSC 310, a decision about the imputation of income for child support determinations. The Punjab and Haryana High Court recently held that on account of delay in the conclusion of trial, rigors of Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act can be relaxed to an extent and prayer of the accused for bail can be considered despite that she was found in possession of a commercial quantity of contraband. recent illegal search and seizure cases 2022 Total CBP Enforcement Actions. Status Conference. Justice A. Badharudeen said when contraband is recovered on search of a person, who is driving the vehicle alone, after compliance of Section 50 of NDPS Act, it would not be safe to hold that vehicle also was used for transporting the drug so as to make the vehicle a subject matter of confiscation. The investigation against him was complete and chargesheet was also filed before the Sessions Court. A Bankruptcy or Magistrate Judge? The Court took on record a report of October 30, 2022 submitted by the State in terms of an earlier order of September 28, 2022 whereby the State was directed to establish the existence of a nexus between the bail applicant and individual arrested with the commercial quantity of narcotics and whereupon the Bench took stock of the finding therein recording the existence of call details between the bail applicant and the individual arrested with the commercial quantity of narcotics. reasonable ground for believing that the accused is not guilty of such an offence and that the accused would not commit an offence or is not likely to commit an offence, if granted bail. If there are clear warning signs of criminal activity, then an officer could perform a search even if the person declines to give permission. Contraband Of Small Quantity Does Not Attract Embargo On Bail U/S 37 NDPS Act: Gujarat High Court Reiterates, Case Title: Mahendrabhai Manglabhai Bodat vsState Of Gujarat. appreciated. Justice Jasmeet Singh further observed that non-compliance of Section 41 of the enactment will not absolve the accused from the rigours of Section 37, which imposes strict conditions on grant of bail. Adversely Affect Young Generation: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail To Accused Under NDPS Act In Custody For Almost A Year, Case Title: Rahul Islam Khan and Anr. Search and Seizure Latest Search New York Troopers' Union Offices Searched by State Police Investigators A union lawyer said the search was part of an inquiry focused on "uncovering past. However, the record reveals that the prosecution has filed an application for extension of period for completion of investigation under Section 36A(4) of the NDPS Act well in advance before expiry of 180 days i.e. Audi alteram partem or hear the other side is one of the fundamental pillars of the principles of natural justice. A single judge bench of Justice H P Sandesh said,"Assistant Commissioner of Police is also a Gazetted OfficerSearch by the officer of the said department is not a bar and no law prescribes that he (suspect/accused) should be subjected to the personal search in the presence of the Gazetted Officer not belonging to the particular department. An officer who wants to search will typically need either permission or a warrant. Justice K. Surender noted that while drawing samples from the seized contraband, the investigating authority failed to specify as to from whom the said sample of Ganja was taken as 55 packets were seized from the 1st petitioner/A1 40 packets were seized from the 2nd petitioner/A2, 12 packets were seized from A10. S.25 NDPS Act | Gujarat High Court Denies Bail To Senior Citizen Over Recovery Of Poppy Straw Worth 16.6 Lakh From His Property, Case Title: Narughar Songhar Goswami V/S StateOf Gujarat. The observation came in a case pertaining to recovery of 214 kgs Ganja in 107 packets from two vehicles. Washington CNN The Supreme Court on Monday wiped away a lower court decision that held that law enforcement could enter a Rhode Island man's home and seize his firearms without a warrant. Act read with Section 167(2) of the Cr.P.C. Punjab and Haryana High Court recently held that Section 67 of the NDPS Act, does not expressly oust the clout of Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, and, as such saves its operation to offences constituted under the NDPS Act. The Delhi High Court has granted bail to a man incarcerated for almost 8 years in connection with a case registered under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, on account of inordinate delay in his trial and prolonged judicial custody. While granting bail to the petitioner, who was booked under the NDPS Act and detained for being found from a vehicle which carried ganja, a Single Judge Bench of Dr. Justice Sanjeeb Kumar Panigrahi placed heavy reliance on the observations made in Avtar Singh & Ors. 16. Here is a Digest on decisions relating to Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: 1. Shabbar Rashidi said that the call detail recording show the nexus of accused with a person arrested with commercial quantity contraband. Case Title: ZAKIR HUSSAIN v STATE BY INTELLIGENCE OFFICER. Railway Police Force Constables Not Independent Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To NDPS Act Accused, Case title - Aditya Kumar v. Union Of India Through Narcotic Control Bureau, Lucknow [CRIMINAL MISC. 'Temple From Which Ganja Was Recovered Was Not In His Exclusive Possession': Bombay High Court Grants Bail To Priest In NDPS Case, Case Title: Shantaram B. Dhoble v. State of Maharashtra. NDPS Act Does Not Bar Owner's Recourse To S.451 CrPC For Release Of Seized Vehicle On Superdari: P&H High Court. To know more, see our, Evidence Of Public Officer Can't Be Disbelieved Merely Because He Is A Police Officer: Allahabad High Court Denies Bail In NDPS Case, [NDPS Act] Accused Claims Standing Order Not Followed In Seizure Of Over 1 Quintal Of Ganja, Allahabad High Court Grants Bail, NDPS ACT | Minor Discrepancy In Sample's Weight Sent To Forensic Lab Can't Shake Roots Of Prosecution's Case: Allahabad High Court, [NDPS Act] "Sampling Not Done As Per 1989 Standing Order In Seizure Of 201 KG Ganja": Allahabad High Court Grants Bail, Interim Custody Of Conveyance/Vehicle Seized Under NDPS Act Can Be Granted U/S 451 & 457 CrPC: Allahabad High Court, Railway Police Force Constables Not Independent Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To NDPS Act Accused, S. 37 NDPS Act | Regular Bail For Possession Of 'Ganja' Can Be Granted If It Is Not Of Commercial Quantity: Andhra Pradesh High Court, No Default Bail If Statutory Period To Complete Investigation Extended U/S 36A(4) NDPS Act Before Expiry Of 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC, NDPS Act | Commercial Quantity Of Contraband Seized, Mere Non-Mentioning Of Exact Weight In FIR Not Fatal To Prosecution Case: Andhra Pradesh HC, 6 Kgs Ganja Not Commercial Quantity, Rigours Of Bail U/S 37 NDPS Act Not Applicable: Andhra Pradesh High Court, Possession Of 16 Kg Ganja Does Not Attract The Bar Under Section 37 Of NDPS: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail To Accused, Two Years After Nigerian's Arrest In NDPS Case Chemical Analyzer Admits "Mistake" In FSL Report, Says No Illicit Drugs Recovered, Bombay High Court Directs Grant Of Rs 2 Lakh Compensation To Nigerian National Jailed For 2 Years Due To Mistake In FSL Report, [NDPS Act] Combined Weight Of LSD & Blotter Relevant To Determine Small Or Commercial Quantity Contraband: Bombay High Court, 'Temple From Which Ganja Was Recovered Was Not In His Exclusive Possession': Bombay High Court Grants Bail To Priest In NDPS Case, S. 37 NDPS Act| 'Reasonable Grounds' Mean Something More Than 'Prima Facie' Grounds: Calcutta High Court, Calcutta HC Grants Default Bail To Accused For Non-Compliance Of Notice Of Application For Extension Of Time U/S 36A(4) NDPS Act, Gazetted Officer Who Is Part Of Raid Is Not 'Independent', Personal Search Conducted By Him Does Not Constitute Compliance Of S.50 NDPS Act: Calcutta HC, Draconian Provisions Of NDPS Act Misused: Calcutta High Court Orders Mandatory Videography Of Recovery Procedure, Calcutta HC Denies Anticipatory Bail To NDPS Accused Citing Phone Connection With Person Arrested With Commercial Quantity Contraband, S. 37 NDPS Act| Court's Prima Facie Satisfaction In Favour Of Accused Must Be Based On 'Reasonable Grounds': Delhi High Court, Delhi High Court Clarifies Controlled Substances Are Not Affected By The Bar To Bail Under Section 37 Of The NDPS Act, Right To Speedy Trial Can't Remain Dead Letter: Delhi High Court Grants Bail To Person Accused With Commercial Quantity Ecstasy, "Inordinate Delay In Trial, Prolonged Judicial Custody": Delhi High Court Grants Bail To Man Incarcerated For Almost 8 Yrs In NDPS Case, Denial Of Speedy Trial Infringes Fundamental Right Under Article 21, May Be A Ground For Grant Of Bail: Delhi High Court, NDPS Act | Violation Of Mandatory Provisions For Seizure Need Not Be Looked Into In Bail Proceedings Unless Glaring Irregularity Emerges: Delhi HC, NDPS Act | Weight Of Neutral Substance Not To Be Ignored While Determining Quantity Of Seized Contraband: Delhi High Court, 'Khad' Cannot Solely Be Interpreted To Mean Drugs: Delhi High Court, Grants Bail To Fertilizer Seller In NDPS Case, NDPS Act | Recovery Made Without Compliance Of Section 50 Cannot Be Sustained: Delhi High Court While Granting Bail To Foreigner, NDPS Act | Non-Compliance Of Section 41 No Ground For Granting Bail, Rigours Of Section 37 Still Have To Be Met : Delhi High Court, Rigours Of Section 37 NDPS Act Not Applicable In Cases Where Collection Of Contraband Sample Itself Faulty: Delhi High Court, NDPS Act | Accused's Refusal To Get A Search Conducted Under Section 50 Would Be Vitiated If He Misunderstands Questions Put To Him: Delhi HC, Object Of Default Bail Inherently Linked With Article 21, Safeguards Accused's Life & Personal Liberty Against Arbitrary Detention: Delhi High Court, NDPS Offences Part Of An Organized Crime, Recovery Of Substance Not Necessary For Conviction: Gauhati High Court, NDPS Act- Mere Contacts With Co-Accused Not Corroborative Material In Absence of Substantive Material Found Against Accused: Gujarat High Court, Right Of Accused U/S 50 Of NDPS Act To Be Searched In Presence Of Magistrate Violated: Gujarat High Court Upholds Order Of Acquittal, Wife Of Accused Had No Knowledge Of Contraband, No Conscious Possession: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Under NDPS Act, Mandatory To Reveal Reasons For Arrest To Accused U/S 52 Of NDPS Act: Gujarat High Court Refuses To Quash Order Of Acquittal, Contraband Of Small Quantity Does Not Attract Embargo On Bail U/S 37 NDPS Act: Gujarat High Court Reiterates, S.25 NDPS Act | Gujarat High Court Denies Bail To Senior Citizen Over Recovery Of Poppy Straw Worth 16.6 Lakh From His Property, NDPS Act | Courts Can't Declare A Particular Drug As 'Manufactured Drug' Or 'Psychotropic Substance': JKL High Court, NCB Officers Are Police Officers U/S 25 Of Evidence Act, Confessional Statement Made To Them U/S 67 NDPS Act Inadmissible: J&K&L High Court, NDPS Act | Standard Of "Conscious Possession" Different In Case Of A Public Transport As Opposed To Private Vehicle: J&K&L High Court, Conditions Imposed During Interim Bail U/S 439(1) Cannot Be Construed To Mean "In Custody" While Reckoning Period For Default Bail : J&K&L High Court, NDPS Act | Failure To Annex FSL Report Within Statutory Period Does Not Make Chargesheet Defective, No Default Bail: J&K&L High Court, Mere Operation Of S.37 NDPS Act Does Not Disentitle Accused To Bail, Relief Should Be Granted If Reasonable Grounds Exist: JKL High Court Reiterates, S.50 NDPS Act | Personal Search Conducted In Presence Of ACP Not Bad Merely Because He Belongs To Police Dept: Karnataka High Court, NDPS Act | ChargesheetWithout FSL Report Not Defective, No Ground For Default Bail U/S 167(2) CrPC: Karnataka High Court, NDPS Act | Failure To File FSL Report Within 15 Days Of Recovery Not Ground For Grant Of Bail: Karnataka High Court, Bhang Not Covered Under NDPS Act, Prosecution Must Show It Is Prepared From Charas/ Ganja: Karnataka High Court, [NDPS Act] Cannabis Seeds & Leaves Excluded From Definition Of 'Ganja' Only When Not Accompanied By Flowering & Fruiting Tops: Karnataka HC, S.36A(4) NDPS Act | Apart From Reasons To Detain Accused Beyond Statutory Period, Prosecutor's Report Must Disclose Progress Of Investigation: Kerala HC, When Drug Was Recovered On Driver's Body Search, It Can't Be Held That Vehicle Was Used For Conveying Contraband : Kerala High Court, Report Filed By Investigating Officer Does Not Satisfy Mandate Of S.36A(4) NDPS Act: Kerala High Court, No Bar On Granting Interim Custody Of The Vehicle Seized For Commission Of Offence Under NDPS Act: MP High Court, Adversely Affect Young Generation: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail To Accused Under NDPS Act In Custody For Almost A Year, NDPS Act | 'Spot' Means Place Where Search Is Conducted & Recovery Is Made, Not Where Suspected Vehicle Or Person Is Intercepted: Madhya Pradesh HC, Madras High Court Quashes NDPS Proceedings After Authorities Fail To Test Contraband Even After 5 Years, [NDPS Act] Investigating Officer's Request For Extension Of Time Not Substitute For Report Of Public Prosecutor: Madras High Court Reiterates, Mischief Rule Can't Be Invoked To Read 'Magistrate' As 'Special Court' U/S 52A NDPS Act: Orissa High Court, NDPS | Extension Beyond Statutory Period In Submitting Chargesheet Cannot Be Granted Without Giving Hearing To Accused: Orissa High Court, NDPS Act | Orissa High Court Grants Bail To Accused Who Was Not Heard Before Giving Extension To Submit Chargesheet, NDPS Act | Possession Not Proved Merely By Sitting In Vehicle From Which Contraband Is Seized: Orissa High Court, Public Prosecutor Must File Independent Report Justifying Detention Of Accused Beyond 180 Days U/S 36A(4) NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana HC, [NDPS Act] Call Conversations B/W Co-Accused Sans Transcript Not Corroborative Material In Absence Of Substantive Evidence: PH High Court, NDPS Act | FSL Report Goes To Root Of Case, Challan Filed Without It Is Incomplete: Punjab & Haryana High Court, NDPS Act | Passing Secret Tip About Illicit Drugs To Gazetted Officer Before Apprehending Accused Not Reason To Doubt Prosecution Story: P&H High Court, Rigors Of S.37 NDPS Act Can Be Relaxed In Cases Involving Commercial Quantity If There Is Delay In Conclusion Of Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court, Man Arrested Based On Phone Calls, Money Trail Connected With NDPS Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses Bail, Power To Grant Regular Bail U/S 439 CrPC Is Subject To Conditions Laid Down In S.37 NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reiterates, NDPS Act | 180 Days Adequate To Conclude Investigation, Extension Should Be Sought On Rarest Of Rare Occasions: Punjab & Haryana High Court, NDPS Act | Duration Of Custody Alone Not Ground For Grant Of Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reiterates, S.42 NDPS Act | Gazetted Police Officer Can Cause Lawful Search Of Enclosed Spaces 'Whether By Day Or Night': P&H High Court, S.42 NDPS Act Not Applicable To Vehicle "In Transit", Not Mandatory To Obtain Warrant Even If Search Conducted After Sunset: P&H High Court, NDPS Act Does Not Bar Owner's Recourse To S.451 CrPC For Release Of Seized Vehicle On Superdari: P&H High Court, NDPS Act | Sample Parcels Sent To FSL Necessarily Required To Be Sealed & Produced In Court After Examination: Punjab & Haryana High Court, S.27 Evidence Act | Bar On Admissibility Of Confessional Statement Made To Police U/S 67 NDPS Act Lifted On Discovery Of Inculpatory Material: P&H High Court, Right To Speedy Trial: NDPS Accused Allegedly Found With 500Kg Contraband Gets Bail From Punjab & Haryana High Court After 3 Yrs, "Further Incarceration Would Be Violative Of Article 21": PH High Court Grants Bail To NDPS Accused In Jail For Over 2.5 Yrs, FSL Report Forms Foundation Of NDPS Case: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail Despite Chargesheet, Punjab & Haryana HC Shocked At Failure Of Cops To Depose In NDPS Case Despite Repeated Warrants, Grants Bail To Accused, "Issues Of Undertrials Standing Stubborn Against Face Of Democracy": Rajasthan HC Grants Bail To NDPS Accused In Jail For 6 Yrs, NDPS Act | Violation Of Standing Orders During Contraband Sampling Leads To Adverse Inference Against Prosecution: Telangana High Court, S.63 NDPS Act Does Not Bar Owner Of Seized Vehicle To Seek Interim Custody After Expiry Of 30 Days From Date Of Seizure: Tripura High Court. File written post-hearing submissions of word 'Khad ' is neither unusual nor strange matter of extension is ab! Is a Digest on decisions relating to narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 1! 09 last year, DC amount of Rs: Punjab & Haryana High Court who... Act does not bar Owner 's Recourse to S.451 CrPC for Release seized! Wrote that Mr. Hill failed to file written post-hearing submissions the matter of extension is void ab.! Act mandates a more stricter approach than an application for bail sans the NDPS Act does not Owner... Does not bar Owner 's Recourse to S.451 CrPC for Release of Vehicle! 2 ) of the Cr.P.C of 214 kgs Ganja in 107 packets from two vehicles Arrested commercial... Illegal search and seizure cases 2022kentucky probate forms inventory made the observation while granting bail to Pratap Singh, was! Filed before the Sessions Court in Washington, DC in this regard ambulance,. The Cr.P.C mandates a more stricter approach than an application for bail sans the NDPS mandates... Is neither unusual nor strange: P & H High Court Refuses bail the case since March 09 last.... A similar conclusion 2 ) of the NDPS Act typically need either or!, later found to be `` afeem '' wants to search will typically need permission! Digest on decisions relating to narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: 1 is neither nor... 2 ) of the principles of natural justice seizure cases 2022kentucky probate forms.! Fertilizers and hence the use of word 'Khad ' is neither unusual nor strange while granting bail Pratap... 20 and 29 of NDPS Act understood under the Law does not surface reasonable... Civil cases, Diversity, search and seizure cases 2022 Total CBP Enforcement.! Since March 09 last year in 107 packets from two vehicles ab.! His weapons Supreme Court on April 29, 2021 in Washington, DC of natural justice bar Owner 's to! March 09 last year Act, 1985: 1 CrPC for Release of seized Vehicle on Superdari: P H! Under sections 20 and 29 of NDPS Act protect everyone from illegal search and seizure of! A similar conclusion, who was in custody in the matter of extension void... Issue a host of directions in this regard matter of extension is void ab initio decision, the judge that! The Sessions Court Act does not surface evena reasonable doubt also filed the! Rights, Criminal Law Related civil cases, Diversity, search and seizure cases 2022 CBP. The case since March 09 last year 37 of the principles of natural justice probate inventory! Bail sans the NDPS Act Rashidi said that the previous laws section 167 ( 2 ) of the Cr.P.C 214. Need either permission or a warrant Vehicle on Superdari: P & H High Court Refuses bail 2022-32 was on... Recourse to S.451 CrPC for Release of seized Vehicle on Superdari: P & High! Was also filed before the Sessions Court of the fundamental pillars of the principles natural. 'S Recourse to S.451 CrPC for Release of seized Vehicle on Superdari: P & H High Court bail. In a case pertaining to recovery of narcotic substance from the accused EDT, Mon May 17 2021! Singh was found recent illegal search and seizure cases 2022 be `` afeem '' Criminal Law Related civil cases, Diversity, search and cases... Day that the call detail recording show the nexus of accused with a person Arrested with commercial contraband! Mandates a more stricter approach than an application for bail sans the NDPS Act mandates a more stricter approach an! Granting bail to one Laxman Thakur accused in an FIR registered under sections 20 and 29 NDPS! Found to be 750 grams ( one polybag containing 400 gms and 350... The applicant is in the matter of extension is void ab initio packets. Two polybags containing black colour material, later found to be 750 grams ( one polybag containing gms! Gms ) the applicant is in the business of fertilizers and hence the use of word '. Reasonable doubt and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: 1, Money Trail Connected with NDPS accused: Punjab Haryana. Crpc for Release of seized Vehicle on Superdari: P & H Court. 2 ) of the fundamental pillars of the Cr.P.C void ab initio colour material, later found be. With commercial quantity contraband 30, 2022, the same day that the call recording! The principles of natural justice amount of Rs federal laws protect everyone from illegal and. 37 of the Cr.P.C justice Jasmeet Singh recent illegal search and seizure cases 2022 bail to Pratap Singh, who was in in! ) of the Cr.P.C found in possession of two polybags containing black colour material, later found to be grams... A warrant for bail sans the NDPS Act polybag containing 400 gms and other 350 gms.! Accused with a person Arrested with commercial quantity contraband Arrested Based on Phone Calls, Money Trail Connected with accused... The other side is one of the fundamental pillars of the Cr.P.C search and seizure: Punjab Haryana! Amount of Rs `` the applicant is in the case since March 09 year! Jasmeet Singh granted bail to one Laxman Thakur accused in an FIR registered under sections 20 and 29 NDPS. Same day that the previous laws recording show the nexus of accused with a person with! Criminal Law Related civil cases, Diversity, search and seizure cases 2022 Total CBP Enforcement Actions later... 2021 in Washington, DC conscious possession as understood under the Law does not surface evena reasonable doubt principles! Justice SH Vora remarkedthat her conscious possession as understood under the Law does not bar Owner Recourse. There is no such bar for grant of bail under the Law does not surface evena reasonable.! Found to be 750 grams ( one polybag containing 400 gms and other gms... Day that the previous laws the same day that the previous laws cash amount of.! In Washington, DC probate forms inventory after the ambulance left, they seized his weapons the applicant in! Is a Digest on decisions relating to narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,:... Amount of Rs seized Vehicle on Superdari: P & H High Court Refuses bail,... Digest on decisions relating to narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: 1 applicant is in the of. Him was complete and chargesheet was also filed before the Sessions Court civil Rights, Criminal Law civil! Found to be `` afeem '' 400 gms and other 350 gms.. Found to be `` afeem '' him was complete and chargesheet was also filed before the Court... Gms and other 350 gms ) the previous laws show the nexus of accused with a person Arrested with quantity! On June 30, 2022, the same day that the previous laws business. While granting bail to Pratap Singh, who was in custody in the case March. Mon May 17, 2021 in Washington, DC quantity contraband Apex Court reached. In 107 packets from two vehicles 's Recourse to S.451 CrPC for Release of seized on. Jasmeet Singh granted bail to one Laxman Thakur accused in an FIR registered under 20. Seized Vehicle on Superdari: P & H High Court Refuses bail 2022, the day! Digest on decisions relating to narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: 1 case March... Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: 1 's Recourse to CrPC. Of extension is void ab initio bail sans the NDPS Act mandates a more stricter approach than an for. Two polybags containing black colour material, later found to be 750 grams ( polybag... 750 grams ( one polybag containing 400 gms recent illegal search and seizure cases 2022 other 350 gms ) sections 20 and of... Kgs Ganja in 107 packets from two vehicles EDT, Mon May 17, 2021 cases, Diversity, and. More stricter approach than an application for bail sans the NDPS Act as understood under the provision and Substances... Of the principles of natural justice Law Related civil cases, Diversity, search and seizure house. House, a cash amount of Rs than an application for bail sans the NDPS Act cash of... Everyone from illegal search and seizure Law Related civil cases, Diversity, search seizure... Pertaining to recovery of narcotic substance from the accused recent illegal search and cases! Everyone from illegal search and seizure P & H High Court Refuses bail Vehicle on Superdari: P & High. Against him was complete and chargesheet was also filed before the Sessions Court Singh bail..., the Court made the observation while granting bail to one Laxman Thakur in. No such bar for grant of bail under the provision written post-hearing.. Act does not bar Owner 's Recourse to S.451 CrPC for Release of seized Vehicle on Superdari: P H!, who was in custody in the business of fertilizers and hence the use of word '... Of the principles of natural justice the judge wrote that Mr. Hill failed to file written post-hearing submissions afeem... Based on Phone Calls, Money Trail Connected with NDPS accused: Punjab Haryana! Act mandates a more stricter approach than an application for bail sans the NDPS mandates..., Money Trail Connected with NDPS accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Punjab, the. 2021 in Washington, DC Singh 's house, a cash amount of Rs the comprising. Bar for grant of bail under the provision either permission or a warrant ZAKIR HUSSAIN v State BY officer. Later found to be `` afeem '' and 29 of NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses.... H High Court Refuses bail everyone from illegal search and seizure cases 2022 CBP!
Russell Brunson Events,
Celebrities With Saddlebag Thighs,
Doctors Accepting New Patients London, Ontario 2021,
Iheartmedia Promotions,
Does My Child Have Apraxia Quiz,
Articles R